Without spoilers, this movie is the most violent one for the animated films I have seen so far. If you want to jump into Flash, this one is good enough that introduces the character through this short film. It shows his backstory and struggle enough and focus on his one arch enemy who is hell bent on destroying Flash.
Post by ladynightroad on Sept 28, 2016 22:07:28 GMT
The last one I've watched was famous "Great Gatsby" I heard so many positive reviews about this movie from my friends and now I can totally agree with them It's amazing, I mean everything, the plot, atmosphere, actor's play... And this retro atmosphere, I definetely adore it! Especially in case of that fashion, hairstyles for men as in this gallery machohairstyles.com/best-great-gatsby-hairstyles/ , beautiful dresses for women... Amazing! I think that now I like retro-years even more than before
Also am I the one who thinks that Di Caprios actor skills became much better through the years?
I watched Zootopia tonight. That's why I wasn't active tonight if you saw me online and not commenting or replying to you or working on the wiki pages of Anime Vice.
I'm surprised that Disney made a political and social movie. The adult jokes weren't subtle. They weren't even trying. I did like the characters. The songs by Shakira wasn't that good or memorable for me.
I feel the show took on too much for its message and when applying to animals, it can be mixed interpretation which can lead to some controversy among fans.
Lastly, they were a bit too plot convenient with their source of their problem.
Overall, I enjoyed it. I recommend to folks who still watch any 3D computer-animated films. Though, I'm not sure if it's suitable for young children. It felt like this film was more for teenagers and adults to me.
I rented Up on Amazon Instant video today. Watched it. It was pretty good, though it wasn't as memorable or has much rewatch value. I have to say the first part of the movie was pretty subtle and powerful.
Saw La La Land in theater and it was fantastic. Just a beautiful movie, with a simple yet enriching plot with an amazing sequence at the end. Ryan Gossling continued to be great in about any movie he is in.
Finally watch Moonlight since it was released in my theater finally, and yeah La La Land should have won best picture. Moonlight was a great movie when it did not try so hard, and the ending just drag on. It was overall B- vs La La Land which was an EASY A.
On the morning of July 15, 1974, American news reporter Christine Chubbuck committed suicide live on-air as she was broadcasting the news. Released at the 2016 Sundance Festival, the trailer to the biopic, "Christine", described the suicide as an event that "changed the face of television." Whether that was true or not, I do not know. It was a sensationalistic statement that got my attention nonetheless. Movies that dramatized the grittier parts of reality have often gripped my interest, such as the similarly-themed "Nightcrawler" starring Jake Gyllenhaal. Whether I enjoy such films, however, is not the problem here, as unlike Nightcrawler, this was based on a true story, so sensationalistic should be the last adjective I use.
Thankfully, the film is anything but dramatized, in spite of Robert Greene's raised concerns towards the ethics of biopics in his satirical doc, "Kate Plays Christine". In case it isn't obvious, Greene's film also dealt with Christine Chubbuck. It was released in the same year and in the same Sundance Festival alongside Antonio Campos' "Christine" biopic. I didn't have the good fortune of watching both films back-to-back as the Sundance audiences did, but I would imagine it would've been a much more effective and impactful experience due to what both films had to say.
See, supposedly, Christine Chubbuck's suicide footage was hot stuff on the Internet. Many people had searched for it. Of course, the legendary videotape was never found, even though there's a news article floating around in recent years claiming otherwise. The one footage you could find on the Internet today (YouTube) has been claimed to be fake by many. The footage, a black and white video, also contradicts what Christine actually said seconds prior to her suicide, "in living colour."
"Kate Plays Christine" criticized such voyeuristic desires to see the suicide footage, while adding on that such a biopic is impossible to be made without dramatizing or glorifying the facts. The actual biopic in question, Campos' "Christine", challenged this notion with a cold and distanced tone that made the film more of an unbiased character study than the disrespectful sensationalism Greene was concerned about. It doesn't try to explain why the tragedy happened, nor should it, because we'll never truly know what went on in Christine's troubled mind (if she's indeed troubled at all at the time of her suicide and not just out to send a message).
However, it's this lack of knowledge that makes Greene's argument about biopics relevant. Rebecca Hall, a wonderful actress I've only seen once in a favorite thriller of mine, Joel Edgerton's "The Gift", played Christine with a proper balance of awkwardness and sympathy. It's a very neutral way to tell us that Christine's solitude was partly due to her own behavior, and yet also attributed to the frustration she faced as a prejudiced working woman during the '60s. I feel that this neutrality, while good-intentioned, makes the portrayal not genuine - that is, if a biopic portrayal could truly be genuine at all in relation to the real life counterpart. Personally, I feel that it's impossible to portray a real life person to a completely accurate level, especially when you're showing that person's flaws. I notice that whenever a film is portraying a flawed individual - be it a suicide victim or a serial killer - they always try to give them some distinct tic or characteristic in order to have an "accurate" imitation. Real people aren't telling the audience a story, so whatever visual tic that defines their individuality wouldn't always be so visible and obvious. So when actresses like Hall try to bring out that "unique" characteristic of theirs, it can seem quite contrived when I compared her to the real life counterpart (albeit after I've seen the film). It's an inherent problem all biopics would face. They asked, "How accurately can you imitate that person?" instead of just, "How do you act like a real person that's not on camera?"
That said, it's probably an unfair criticism. For all the impossible obstacles that Campos had to leap over in creating such a biopic, it is an impressive work by itself. I'm glad the film took such a step back from forcing some meaningful message about feminism or sensationalism onto the audience and simply showed us what kind of life Christine might have lived. It's the ultimate expression of filmmaking - simply showing life itself. It's not a perfect way to tell Christine's story (and I couldn't imagine if there ever will be), but it's one that's worth praising nonetheless.
My Movie Reviews Watching: Kino's Journey (2017), Tonari no Seki-kun, Zankyou no Terror